Because I strongly believe that the suggestions intelligent and provocative, always intelligent if, by any party to come should be considered and if accepted the case, I continue to read what they write my political opponents. Probably get hurt because of the clever things I read very little.
Of all the "hacks on the web" I must say I remain particularly impressed by the production director Sergio Terzi.
This gentleman is always poses as a man of good will moderate, with a mission to highlight contradictions (my) laziness and-nothing (always mine) the lack of planning (again mine) and DECLARED the interest of the entire city.
and told with participation, sometimes with dramatic and sorrowful, the truth of the facts that happen.
Unfortunately this is not telling the truth, but a version cleverly (or perhaps unconsciously, more importantly, because it denotes the inability of a balanced opinion) distorted and adjusted to what is happening. But we
last effort, published on his blog on March 8 and that, I have no doubt, will be immediately taken from the site friend (His) castles in the network.
The City Council is a theater, perhaps it is true, of course is a formal event where you must move according to a regulation and where you can not (thankfully) outsource everything that comes to mind with anarchist mode (Palazzo docet) it is a theater where it was set up for the inconsistent political will prevail and where they should arrive to the synthesis of encounters and clashes between majority and minority groups to deliberate on the proposals of those who administer the benefit of all, I repeat the interests of all. A summary of some sentence of the third thought "you get into DC must already know how the game is to vote ..... Majority ...... pulled from the CC is a nuisance to the regent of
turn ....". The idiocy of these statements is obvious, but it's worth arguing: on the agenda for the Majority discusses first CC and agree the vote, is a reprehensible act? do not think so. Who needs to "pull" the CC? A minority enjoying the evening as the (only) opportunity to appear or who has the numbers because the voters them to her data? Ours is a representative democracy, administers and governs who is elected on a mandate from the voters, the critical minority, the majority administration (or government, although some of the friends of either third party does not like this and talk about Benito Berlusconi, as if the millions of Italians who voted for the PDL and continue to vote for it were all comrades).
the city council shall be convened normally every month, from November 29 was expected: that
past holiday season, which will formalize the establishment of the Heritage Castellanza to access the loan for the purchase of camilliani that advice Solbiate and approved the Company Olgiate Olona Valley (23 and February 25, 2010) acts necessary because even the town of Castellanza acting in its turn.
We talk about the resolution / motion on the railways: minorities have a resolution that acting is not (does not include expenditure commitments and does not have the technical characteristics of the resolution) that it is said in the group leaders, stressing that it is the intention of the majority to take the issue under discussion, as technically? O with a series of amendments messy to do in Council or by a much simpler way: enter the agenda as a motion (a motion because it was) is the last point of the motions and then vote to bring him to all other topics. Which was done. So what? Where's the scandal? Perhaps the confusion created (not by me or the majority) because of a series of "slips" of those who had not really sufficient arguments point to the game, "shouting and spariglia" to chaos and not finish anything?
But really must believe in the reconstruction, always a bit 'paternalistic Mr. Terzi, and consider the Northern Railway, which I asked for answers to those questions and could be the spokesperson did not want him to do as a counterparty? Beloved, Ferrovie Nord NOT 'PARTY, is a party, a signatory to the Protocol and Supplementary Act, not the opponent, but someone with whom the Administration must work and work, CONSULTANT is not the Mayor, but let me pleasure!
overflights on the rest, so it is useless to think that now is a dialogue of the deaf.
Mr. Terzi think of what does or does not make him think whether his repeatedly emphasized intellectual honesty is true honesty or his exact opposite, to take responsibility for some concrete action instead of talking to the cricket, its truth does not make us free, only takes off the road. His attitude fits perfectly with the old saying "to hell is paved with good intentions" to hell and I (Eternal Father permitting) I do not want to go.
0 comments:
Post a Comment