Daughter Masterbated With Me

Pragmatism & Demagogy

As expected, after the Supervisory Board yesterday and the first shooting the press (Varese News in particular) I find myself reading the comments of Together for Castello (Zaffaroni, Palazzo & Co.)

The allegations are obviously against all my work: I have rejected the election promises relatively station in Castello, intimidates the citizens of San Giulio by "good" technicians of the municipality ("good" by Manzoni) and the final treat, I'm with the "powers that be" at the expense of the city and exploiting a position of Mayor I use and consumption.

Ferrovie Nord We all know how lot of pressure in making the stop in the castle was carried out by this administration right now (witness the documents that anyone can go and read) the various Supervisory Boards have always called this issue and the sale of the abutments, as has always stressed that the station had to have a effective and practical response to a non-parochial demagogic claim.

I continued to pursue this line , despite forecasts for products used by FNM daunting and against any logic programming and economic management.

Vision was to still make a stop and work to make it usable for the axis of the Olona Valley and with a possible conversion of the existing light rail line Milano-Saronno-Novara.

From 2006 to today, as was the trend?

acceleration of the triple lines of Rho-Gallarate, with priority given to the Y connector on the battle interchange (interchange that, Councillor Fuller's words, "so it will be in the territory of Bust, a what do we care? "in the face of synergies supra);

battle to maintain a decent road in Castle;

battle to fix dates for the closure of the road works (Don Minzoni roundabout at all);

battle to manage a program that would allow the completion of work at an acceptable despite the crack DeLieto, averting the risk that the station there was no bust-Castell own (it was easy to say we pass the train in a tunnel let them stop all the envelopes and FN station when you can you will end up the new station Bust-Castell: result is not a station moved to 800 meters, but no station!)

continuous comparison to find the possible legal formula on the sale of the abutments and in 'College last Saturday was technically identified;

agreements with the town of Busto, Province and Region in collaboration with LIUC for "do not leave on foot" who should use the train to get to work University or finding a solution active from the time when the new railway will be operational.

I have not given up at a bus stop in Castle, but I do not think that this is the first priority for the good of the city and its inhabitants.

Homes San Giulio, we are talking about 13 families that have been made the following proposal: you pay for the move, we let you choose between 2 or 3 house types available and nearby, agreed on the modalities for transfer. This is a mode of approach that can be classified as undue pressure? I would like to know how to demolish a building without first will not move the current occupants, it is clear how the populism and being against still prevails in this case.

My interest is to find a solution for this disgrace town, with the council the solution has been found and we proceed down that path, priority, respecting the dignity of every citizen, especially that of current residents Via S. Giulio.

regard to the powers that enslave is a stupid that we would step on anyone who can come together and review of the facts and contractual agreements with its head what has been contracted to assess whether it was or was not in the interest of the city council and the municipal offices are required by law to provide evidence of each administrative act.

I am the Mayor of castle, I have the responsibility to administer, I have a duty to confront and duty to decide: I have tried to confront and I have not found a partner that he really cares about solving problems, remains a duty to take an intelligence and pragmatism and do this, without making a political career issues (which I do not care) and devoting all the time I left the city after working every day to earn a living free and with no need for anyone to be employed, providing for my family that pays for my administrative work it the highest price: my absence .

Yes dear "together ... maybe ..... castles": my being Mayor is a spirit of service, but the City shall be in due course and will decide to leave town proceedings.

Free Moccasin Boot Pattern

Vade retro Christ?

A thought on Strasbourg ruling I really write it, and it is a painful thought, also based on past experience of the recently troubled path for the drafting of a European constitution, which already gave up to recognize the Judeo-Christian roots of our continent.

Here, as the recent farce about freedom of the press event, once again talking about freedom, but once again out of turn.

These judges have liked to perform on an issue raised by two private Italian citizens, two parents (she is a Finnish), who argue that the crucifix in schools limits their rights individual. The Court has just given them reason for saying that the crucifix "limits the right of parents to educate their children in conformity with their convictions" and "children's right to believe or not believe." It is clear that the right of parents to educate their children "in conformity with their convictions" collides with the right of children to gain their freedom of belief, which should not necessarily be those of father and mother. As regards the "believe and not believe" is not that faith in Italy, as well as all over the world - except in fundamentalist regimes - should be inculcated from the school - where the time freedom of religion - and depends on the symbols you see a little 'everywhere.

The Strasbourg ruling is enforceable, Italy is obliged to call (which the government has already initiated). In short, you lose time and money of the citizens. What is perhaps even more serious are the repercussions that the issue is having in many comments.

Beyond the politics of unity and opposition, that's anthem sung to the Strasbourg Court on Republic by Stefano Rodota: "Europe is watching us, and with a unanimous vote of its judges, it helps us." On Print gives him a hand Ainis Michele: "One can immediately see that no law requires the crucifix in schools. The ruling finally frees us from a misunderstanding that we carry with us for 70 years. "

From these reviews, if they are not bad faith, reveal a dangerous temptation, always present in a certain part of the intellectual elite, the will of the people, its customs and traditions, do not count for anything. It is permissible only what the law requires and provides (not the other way: it is not permitted except what is prohibited by law, the doctrine of liberal societies). It's more to Italian law, we must resort to a supranational law.

In the name of egalitarianism is passed on to the facade of popular sovereignty e.

And against this sovereignty is invoked bodies bureaucracy appointed by those who do not know but that own-initiative of the right to interfere in our freedom. And out of respect for individual opinions is in fact encourages intolerance, secularism (which is quite different from the secularism), the prevalence of views of a few over those of everyone. Great idea of \u200b\u200bdemocracy.

As we are far from the idea of \u200b\u200bsubsidiarity, which truly frees man to choose from and that tolerance for those who claim that history and culture other than depriving us then, with our hands, our history and our culture.

If this is a signal about the type of course that Europe intends to take, or maybe just the Strasbourg Court, maybe you have to wonder if indeed that is our path.

I remember the last sentence of the Gospel of Matthew:

"... I am with you always, until the end of the world. "

This is the cross, a victory over something none of us can win and a promise that none of us can delete: a God who is always with us and gives us the freedom of not accept it.